An investigation · Firsthand account

Inside the Consumer Fraud Network With a $4 Billion Advertising Ambition

Fake founders, fabricated Slack channels, deepfakes, hidden rebills, unauthorized charges, and reported hospitalizations. For nearly two years, I watched what I believe was a sophisticated fraud network use AI to scale - and ultimately expose itself.

By John Hunter Jr.@upnorthjohnny43 Brands IdentifiedExplore #TheEcomList →

Brandon FinkJacob Canfield
PicturedBrandon Fink (left) and Jacob Canfield (right).

Consumers shopping online have reported unauthorized subscriptions, non-existent customer service, stolen credit card information, and duplicate or knock-off products. They have also reported products that never arrived, failed refund requests, and health complications that have included hospitalizations and an alleged death from one of the Serene Herbs products. Meanwhile, advertisements featuring AI-generated medical professionals, synthetic testimonials, and potentially misleading product claims are making it increasingly difficult for consumers to distinguish legitimate businesses from deceptive marketing.

At first glance, these experiences may appear unrelated. Different brands, different products, and different websites. But what happens when some of these businesses share the same advertising agencies, marketing professionals, and methods of acquiring customers?

That’s what this investigation seeks to uncover.

After working extensively inside advertising operations associated with Wired2Scale and several consumer brands, I began examining similarities between practices I personally witnessed and complaints being reported publicly by consumers.

This investigation moves beyond my personal experiences to examine the advertising practices, business relationships, and consumer complaints associated with these operations. Through firsthand documentation, public records, and consumer accounts, it seeks to distinguish established facts from unresolved allegations and identify patterns that warrant further scrutiny.

The central question is simple: Are consumers experiencing isolated problems with individual brands, or are some of these complaints connected through a larger system of advertising and e-commerce operations?

Report Wired2Scale for Suspected Fraud

If you believe you have experienced deceptive advertising, unauthorized charges, or other potentially fraudulent practices involving WIRED2SCALE or associated brands, you may file a report with the FTC. Provide truthful information based on your own experiences or available evidence. Filing a report does not guarantee an investigation.


Section 01What Consumers Are Reporting

The consumers come first, because this investigation is about them. What follows are the problems people report across brands connected to the advertising operations I examined, organized by the type of harm. Unless a caption says otherwise, these are consumer allegations and public reviews, not findings I have independently confirmed. Many of the screenshots do not show which company a review is about, and I have not added brand names where the screenshot itself does not name one.

What appears here is only a handful of complaints drawn from about five brands. It is a small fraction of the complaints and fraud allegations I have seen across nearly all of the companies discussed in this report. Hundreds of similar complaints are publicly available, and I suspect thousands more have never been reported.

Unexpected Charges and Hidden Subscriptions

Consumers report recurring billing they do not remember authorizing, duplicate transactions, and charges that appear to go through after a checkout tells them the payment was declined. In the allegations I make later in this report, I allege that hidden subscriptions and rebills were structured into alternative landing pages and checkout flows that obscured the billing terms.

Trustpilot review for Tiger Mist titled SCAMMERS! Stole my credit card data
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated May 3, 2025 titled “SCAMMERS! Stole my credit card data.” The reviewer reports entering credit card information on the site, receiving a text from the bank confirming a successful transaction, and being told by the site that the card was declined. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review describing a double charge and no order
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review titled “Possible scam” describing a double bank charge, a claimed declined payment, an auto-filled incorrect address, and no order received. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.

Below are additional Trustpilot reviews from consumers who say they were enrolled in subscriptions or charged without their authorization. Several describe cancellation attempts that went nowhere, charges that continued after cancelling, and refund requests that were refused. Where a brand name is not visible in the screenshot, the caption says so rather than guessing. They are shown as consumer complaints, not established findings.

Trustpilot review for Groomie titled They are sending product I did not order
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated October 8, 2026 for Groomie titled “They are sending product I did not…,” reporting unauthorized charges to the reviewer's credit card, product the reviewer says was never ordered, and email replies that pointed to a site that did not work. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Warning Warning this company signs you up without you knowing
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated September 22, 2026 titled “Warning Warning this company signs you…,” reporting being enrolled in an auto-ship of razor blades every six weeks for $30 without consent, and being charged after cancelling the subscription. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Beware describing a subscription disguised as a shaver company
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated September 6, 2026 titled “Beware,” reporting that the company is “a subscription service disguised as shaver company” and that customers are subscribed without their consent. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Company is a Scam describing a purchase that became a subscription
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated April 30, 2026 titled “Company is a Scam,” reporting that a purchase “automatically turned into a subscription,” that return shipping was deducted despite an advertised money-back guarantee, and that the policy page was changed after the fact. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Extremely hard to cancel subscription
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated February 5, 2026 titled “Extremely hard to cancel subscription,” reporting that repeated calls and emails did not cancel the subscription and that the reviewer had to contact their bank. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Crooked business with crooked business practices
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated September 18, 2026 titled “Crooked business with crooked business…,” reporting false claims about the product and a cancellation policy the reviewer says was misrepresented. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Scammed on free shipping and then said sorry won't refund you
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated May 11, 2026 titled “Scammed on free shipping and then said…,” reporting a shipping charge the reviewer says was promised free and a refund that was then refused. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.

Products Never Delivered

Other consumers describe orders that never arrive. Trustpilot product reviews for Jupi Nutrition show a 2.69 average across 39 reviews, including multiple verified buyers reporting orders that never shipped or were never received.

Trustpilot product reviews for Jupi Nutrition
Consumer complaintsTrustpilot product reviews for Jupi showing a 2.69 average across 39 reviews, including multiple verified buyers reporting orders that never shipped or were never received. Shown as consumer complaints, not established findings.

Below are additional Trustpilot reviews from consumers who say their orders were never shipped. The reviews report no shipment progress despite a shipping label, unanswered emails, money spent on products that never arrived, and refunds that could only be recovered by calling a bank. They are shown as consumer complaints, not established findings.

Trustpilot review titled Terrible customer service never got the product
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated June 3, 2026 titled “Terrible customer service never got the…,” reporting that the product never arrived and the refund had to be recovered by calling the reviewer's bank. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled My 1st order went well
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated June 16, 2026 titled “My 1st order went well,” reporting that a reorder from the previous month had not shipped, that emails went unanswered for over a week, and that the reviewer ran out of the product while waiting. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Unprofessional and Scamy
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated May 10, 2026 titled “Unprofessional and Scamy,” reporting an order with only a created shipping label for nearly two weeks, a claim that the product had shipped, and a refusal to refund. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Never received my product
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated July 31, 2026 reporting that the product was never received and that the company was not helpful. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled This company is the worst
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated August 20, 2026 titled “This company is the worst,” reporting $114 spent on an order that had not arrived nearly a month later and email replies that told the reviewer to wait. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review about an order stuck in processing
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated March 9, 2026 reporting an order stuck in “processing” with no shipment progress and no clear update on when it would ship. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.

Refund and Cancellation Difficulties

When something goes wrong, consumers describe cancellation attempts that go nowhere, refund requests that go unanswered, and customer service that redirects people to unrelated companies.

Trustpilot review titled OMG just try to cancel
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated October 9, 2026 by Jennifer A Taber, titled “OMG just try to cancel,” reporting that an explicit cancellation request was not accepted despite repeated contact with customer service. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review about being unable to stop a reorder
Consumer complaintVerified Trustpilot review by Harry Batschelet titled “Tried to stop reorder after first order...,” reporting that the reviewer could not stop a reorder and said payment would be refused if the product shipped again. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled It's to hard to cancel this subscription
Consumer complaintVerified Trustpilot review dated September 24, 2026 by Mary, titled “It's to hard to cancel this...”. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review about an order shipped without confirmation
Consumer complaintVerified Trustpilot review dated October 24, 2026 by Gigi, titled “Order shipped without confirmation from me.,” reporting orders the reviewer says were not confirmed and arrived too soon to return. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Please take me off your auto shipment
Consumer complaintVerified Trustpilot review dated September 23, 2026 by Janie Isenberg, titled “Please take me off your auto shipment”. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Keep canceling this subscription
Consumer complaintVerified Trustpilot review dated September 22, 2026 by Patrina Kilkeary, titled “Keep canceling this subscription, please stop.”. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Another forced subscription describing hidden cancel options
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated June 29, 2026 by Kimberly Skach, titled “Another forced subscription...,” describing a subscription the reviewer says was not wanted, a $105 charge notice, and cancellation steps the reviewer says were hidden in near-white text, reversed button labels and a code that had to be requested twice. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Subscription scam
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated August 13, 2026 by Ryan, titled “Subscription scam,” warning others not to purchase. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Terrible about being unable to cancel or reach auri
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated May 14, 2026 by EvE, titled “Terrible,” reporting that cancellation on the website failed and that several emails sent to auri, named in the review body, went unanswered. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review for Deos with a company reply
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review calling Deos “a complete scam,” with a reply allegedly redirecting the reviewer to an unrelated company. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.

Health and Product Safety Concerns

Some of the most serious reports involve health. A Reddit thread in r/PCOS about Sisters Nutrition includes a user comment describing adverse effects after taking the gummies. More serious still is the family account below, which I present as an unverified claim from the people who made it.

Reddit thread in r/PCOS about Sisters Nutrition
Consumer complaintReddit thread in r/PCOS, “Anyone tried sisters nutrition,” including a user comment describing adverse effects after taking the gummies. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.

In a public Facebook post, a man named Anu King wrote that his cousin, Iman, of Chicago, "passed away last Thursday from drinking" Serene Herbs' Soursop Bitters, and that the coroner determined she had a heart attack "brought on by critically low electrolyte levels after taking the bittersweet supplement." He warned others: "Maybe you know someone who is taking it." The post claims the product contains heavy doses of senna leaf extract, a stimulant laxative. It was shared more than 2,800 times and drew hundreds of comments as people passed the warning along.

What is and isn't confirmed

I have not seen a coroner's report, death certificate or medical record, and I have not independently confirmed the cause of death or that the product caused it. The medical and ingredient claims are the poster's, not mine. I am including this because a family is publicly asking for help and warning others, and I believe regulators should look into it. If the family wants to share more, I want to hear from them.

Facebook post by Anu King saying his cousin Iman of Chicago passed away after drinking Serene Soursop Bitters
Social media · Family post (1 of 2)Public Facebook post by Anu King stating that his cousin Iman passed away and attributing her death to the Serene Soursop Bitters supplement. Claims are the poster's and are unverified.
Continuation of the Facebook post showing a Serene Herbs Soursop Bitters bottle and a photo of Iman, with 2.8K shares
Social media · Family post (2 of 2)The rest of the post, showing the Serene Herbs Soursop Bitters bottle beside a photo of Iman. The post shows 505 reactions, 574 comments and 2.8K shares at the time of the screenshot.

Other consumers describe products that made them feel worse rather than better. The reports below are consumer accounts and, in one case, allegations inside a legal filing. None has been independently verified, and the brand behind two of them is not visible in the screenshot.

Trustpilot review titled Fake Products Do Little Good- Beware
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated June 16, 2026 titled “Fake Products Do Little Good- Beware,” in which the reviewer says the products “made my gut issues worse” and warns “You will harm your health!” The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Fradulent business about a colostrum product
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated May 19, 2026 titled “Fradulent business,” in which the reviewer alleges that a colostrum product was “filled with cheap stevia to replace actual colostrum” and says the company became unreachable once there was a problem with the order. The brand is not shown in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Better Business Bureau complaint against Black Girl Vitamins describing worsened symptoms and a refused refund
Consumer complaint · BBBBetter Business Bureau complaint against Black Girl Vitamins dated August 12, 2026, logged as “Product Issues” and still marked “Unanswered.” The complainant says the product had “the opposite effect” and made symptoms worse, that a refund was refused because the bottle had been opened, and that negative reviews are removed from the company's website. The first word of the complaint is redacted in the screenshot. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Page 6 of a legal complaint alleging Black Girl Vitamins exposed consumers to lead without a Proposition 65 warning
Legal filing · allegationsPage 6 of a “Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and Civil Penalties” in which the plaintiff, identified in the filing as ERC, alleges that Black Girl Vitamins knowingly exposed consumers to lead without the warning California's Proposition 65 requires. These are allegations made by a party to the case and are not proven findings.
Product review from a verified buyer titled Irradiated garbage poision since Fukushima accident DO NOT BUY
Consumer complaintStorefront review from a verified buyer, Celestea D, titled “Irradiated garbage poision since Fukushima accident DO NOT BUY!” (spelling as written), alleging that a Soursop Bitters product contains undisclosed seaweed from waters affected by the Fukushima disaster and demanding a refund. The reviewer's health and contamination claims are unverified. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.

Repeated Patterns of Deceptive Advertising

Finally, consumers increasingly encounter advertisements built on synthetic identities: AI-generated medical professionals, fabricated testimonials, and endorsements from people who may not exist. I document how that machinery works in the next section. One recurring complaint pattern adds confusion on top of it: brands whose names resemble other brands, so reviews end up left on the wrong profiles and consumers are left not knowing who to take action against. The complaint below describes an alleged rebrand from Reus Research to “Cata-Kor” alongside a cited “F” Better Business Bureau rating.

Reddit comment about Reus Research rebranding to Cata-Kor
Consumer complaintReddit comment describing an alleged rebrand from Reus Research to “Cata-Kor,” alleging paid TikTok ads, an “F” Better Business Bureau rating, and citing third-party lab testing articles about nicotinamide riboside products. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.

Other reviews in this pattern speak to the advertising itself: reviewers describing ads that did not match the product, promotions they found misleading, and doubts about whether the heavily advertised product resembles what actually ships. These are consumer complaints as posted; none is an established finding, and the company is not identified in the screenshots.

Trustpilot review titled This Is NOT Real Tea reporting the company to the Better Business Bureau
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated September 22, 2026 by Golden Girl, titled “This Is NOT Real Tea,” reporting the company to the Better Business Bureau and saying she also intends to report it to the FDA, alleging the product is advertised as tea but is an artificially sweetened energy-drink-style powder. The reviewer notes a full refund was provided. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Customer service was really nice - but never received
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated October 4, 2026 by Lisa Frances, titled “Customer service was really nice - but never received,” saying her order never arrived despite a reorder attempt and that only a shipping label was created. The reviewer speculates that ads may be AI-generated and the product does not exist; that speculation is hers and is unverified. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Please don't believe the positive comments
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated October 17, 2026 by Emichelle, titled “Please don't believe the positive comments,” describing ads seen across Facebook, Snapchat and television and saying the product did not match its advertising or the positive comments. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled Religion + advertising = classless campaign
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated September 29, 2026 by Katherine, titled “Religion + advertising = classless campaign,” describing an advertisement depicting Jesus holding the product and calling the campaign offensive. The reviewer says she and three friends will no longer order. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled I don't know exactly what is in this...
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated October 2, 2026 by Beverly Law, titled “I don't know exactly what is in this…,” stating the product is not tea and describing stomach pain and diarrhea after drinking it. The health claims are the reviewer's and are unverified. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Trustpilot review titled I'm not the only one talking about...
Consumer complaintTrustpilot review dated September 18, 2026 by shelia filuis, titled “I'm not the only one talking about…,” saying she received three orders with “hardly any powder in them” for the same price and that others have said the same. Shown as a consumer complaint, not an established finding.
Report Consumer Fraud to the FTC

If you believe you have experienced deceptive advertising, unauthorized charges, or other potentially fraudulent practices involving WIRED2SCALE or associated brands, you may file a report with the FTC. Provide truthful information based on your own experiences or available evidence. Filing a report does not guarantee an investigation.

Cryptocurrency Investors: The 2024 $LABZ Controversy

In 2024, supplement company Insane Labz became the subject of an investigation into its $LABZ cryptocurrency promotion.

According to an August 2024 investigation published by Decrypt, individuals impersonating UFC President Dana White, fighter Nate Diaz, and internet personality Hasbulla were allegedly encouraged and paid to promote the cryptocurrency while investors were led to believe the endorsements were genuine.

The investigation cited Telegram communications, investor testimony, and blockchain analysis conducted with Bubblemaps linking wallets associated with the token's creation to payments made to the impersonators.

During the promotion, the token's reported market capitalization rose from approximately $3 million to a peak of $15 million before its value subsequently collapsed by more than 90%. These figures describe market capitalization, not verified proceeds obtained by the promoters or confirmed investor losses.

The allegations raise serious questions about deceptive endorsements, investor inducement, and the use of fabricated identities to promote financial products. The reporting does not, by itself, establish that a court or regulator found the project to be a Ponzi scheme.

Translated republication of Decrypt's article on Insane Labz and the LABZ token, describing impersonators of Dana White, Nate Diaz and Hasbulla
Press coverage · Republished translationPANews/BlockBeats translation of Decrypt's article “How a Sports Brand Used Fake Celebs to Pump an ‘Insane’ Cryptocurrency” by Ryan S. Gladwin. Shown as published reporting; the allegations are Decrypt's, not established findings.

Source: Decrypt, August 12, 2024: How a Sports Brand Used Fake Celebs to Pump an ‘Insane’ Cryptocurrency

These Reports Represent Only a Portion of the Allegations

The complaints and incidents presented here represent only a selection of the publicly reported allegations and documented concerns involving the businesses examined in this investigation. They are not an exhaustive inventory of consumer complaints, disputed transactions, advertising practices, or allegations associated with these brands. Inclusion in this investigation does not establish that every allegation is substantiated or that every business or individual named bears responsibility.

Protect Consumers: Report Suspected Fraud

If you believe you have experienced deceptive advertising, unauthorized charges, or other potentially fraudulent practices involving WIRED2SCALE or associated brands, you may file a report with the FTC. Provide truthful information based on your own experiences or available evidence. Filing a report does not guarantee an investigation.


From the authorWhy I Have Firsthand Knowledge

From November 2024 through August 2026, I worked inside advertising operations connected to Wired2Scale, BNGR and several consumer brands as a UGC creator, videographer, editor, designer and creative strategist. My responsibilities gave me direct access to advertising campaigns, creative production, campaign performance and the marketing funnels consumers actually encountered. As I worked, I began comparing the practices I was witnessing with the complaints consumers were reporting publicly.

The exhibits below are a small selection of the internal records I preserved to substantiate that access. They show advertising spend on my original creative beside the AI-generated and derivative creative built from it - the same practice this report examines from the consumer's side.

Original creative (left) beside AI derivative creative (right), with spend figures
Exhibit 04Left: original creative, submitted June 22, 2026. Right: AI / derivative creative, launched June 24, 2026. Center panel shows spend: John originals $5,042.52; Motif derivatives $167,586.09.
Two original creatives (left, center) beside an AI synthetic recreation (right)
Exhibit 05Left and center: original creative, submitted June 22, 2026. Right: AI synthetic recreation, launched June 24, 2026.

Section 02How the Advertising Works

AI-generated UGC is not illegal, nor is artificial intelligence in advertising inherently deceptive. My concern is how I believe Jacob Canfield, Brandon Fink, and individuals within their business network have used this technology alongside a broader pattern of questionable commercial practices.

I encountered thousands of AI-generated advertisements, synthetic identities, fabricated or potentially misleading testimonials, and digital personas presented as customers, founders, doctors, nurses and other authority figures. Some portrayed personal experiences or professional expertise I believe did not belong to the individuals depicted. Across nearly all of the funnels I examined, I found health claims that exceeded what the research established, and the research itself often appeared fake or, at the very least, misleading.

The recording below shows the sequence that concerns me most. An advertisement presents a natural weight-loss supplement, with AI-generated medical professionals appearing to endorse it. A consumer who clicks is taken to a landing page offering GLP-1 medication treatment from another company. I documented at least a dozen Facebook advertisements featuring AI-generated medical professionals in that funnel. This is not speculation: the advertising expenditure and the funnel redirection are firsthand observations, supported by the records I preserved. Playback is accelerated 200%.

Video 02Screen recording showing AI-generated medical professionals in advertisements leading to a landing page offering GLP-1 treatment. The ad spend and redirection were observed firsthand; whether the arrangement was authorized, how funds were accounted for, and whether client companies were involved remain unverified. Playback accelerated 200%.

That funnel raises separate questions at the same time. The first is consumer deception: advertisements appear to attract consumers with promises of a natural weight-loss supplement, only to redirect them toward GLP-1 medication treatment. The second is financial: if one company pays for advertisements that generate customers and revenue for another company, who is actually benefiting from that advertising expenditure? The redirection is documented. Whether the arrangement was authorized, how expenses and revenue were accounted for, and whether improper financial transactions occurred remain unverified.

There is also a third question. Meta restricts advertising for prescription medications, including GLP-1 weight-loss drugs, which generally require prior authorization and additional eligibility requirements. If a natural supplement funnel is being used to attract consumers to prescription treatment, it may be doing an end run around restrictions that would otherwise apply. I am not claiming that policy circumvention has been established. I am saying the funnel I observed makes the question unavoidable.

Across the funnels I examined, the product advertised and the product offered at checkout were frequently not the same thing, and subscription structures were arranged so that recurring charges continued whether or not consumers understood the billing terms. Synthetic testimonials and manufactured social proof repeatedly stood in for real customer experiences.

The Level of AI and Deepfake Technology Involved

To understand how convincing these advertisements can be, it helps to see the technology firsthand. The video below shows my original video beside a recreation made with an AI avatar. The avatar delivers my exact script, using my own copy, in a format built to look like a real person speaking from real experience.

This was not a rough imitation. In my view, it shows a level of AI and deepfake capability that allows a single original video to be cloned, re-voiced, and redeployed across brands quickly, without the original creator's involvement or compensation. Most consumers scrolling past an advertisement like this would have no reason to suspect that the person on screen does not exist.

Video 01Stole my original content and recreated it with an AI avatar.

Ai Deepfake in Google Meet/ Zoom settings used for fraudulent inducement

But their use of this technology was not limited to advertising. In my experience, they also deployed AI and deepfake technology on Google Meets and Zoom, which they did for nearly a year in an attempt to fraudulently induce me into transferring my priceless intellectual property. This is not only the ability to deceive consumers in an advertisement. It is the ability to put a believable face on a live video call.

Camera display showing Jacob at the recording setJacob seated at the desk with recording lights and equipment
Exhibit 01Jacob's creative space for deepfake and AI-generated deceptive advertisements. (He asked for my help to set this up and told me it was for courses for his crypto community.)
Jacob's AI deepfake persona
Exhibit 11Jacob's AI deepfake persona he has been using for over a year to try to illegally obtain intellectual property, creative strategy, labor, and know how from me with.

Copying Products, Ideas, and Creative at Speed

The comparison below shows my original UNALIVED herbal protocol beside a Serene Herbs tincture serving the same purpose, with packaging that features elements I believe resemble my original designs. I allege this is one of many times they copied my products and ideas and used them to scale other brands while avoiding compensating me.

From what I observed, this is how the operation works: when a product, idea, or ad starts performing, it is duplicated quickly and without hesitation, then pushed out under other brands. This is my personal experience, but it was not unique to me. I witnessed the same thing happen to others repeatedly. Taking other people's ads and B-roll footage was, in my experience, standard operating procedure when working with them.

Both bottles are shown exactly as supplied, unmodified, so readers can compare the packaging themselves.

Side-by-side comparison of the author's original UNALIVED Organic Black Walnut and Wormwood Herbal Protocol bottle and the Serene Herbs Soursop Digestive Reset Drops bottle

My Original UNALIVED Design

Serene Herbs Product

ComparisonMy original UNALIVED design beside the Serene Herbs product. I allege this is one of many times they copied my products and ideas and used them to scale other brands while avoiding compensating me. Both bottles shown exactly as supplied, unmodified, so readers can compare the packaging themselves. Tap either image to view it at full resolution.

Section 03The Advertising Operations and the People Involved

My investigation focuses on Jacob Canfield, Brandon Fink, Wired2Scale, BNGR.io, BKFenterprises, WKND Digital and associated businesses. The scale of the infrastructure behind them matters: Brandon Fink has publicly stated that his network expects to spend approximately $4 billion on advertising over the next year. That figure is a projection, not verified spending, and it is not evidence of fraud on its own. But it provides critical context for the size of the operation examined in this report.

Why the Scale Matters

A publicly stated ambition to spend $4 billion on advertising raises important questions about the safeguards surrounding these operations.

During my involvement with advertising operations associated with Brandon Fink, Jacob Canfield, and Wired2Scale, I witnessed practices that I believe warrant scrutiny beyond any individual brand.

One example involved the use of my Facebook account and advertising identity through whitelisting arrangements to develop and reach audiences of Black consumers.

My concern is not that Black consumers were targeted with advertisements. Demographic marketing is not inherently unlawful.

My concern is how these audiences were developed and subsequently marketed to, particularly when viewed alongside evidence of synthetic medical endorsements, potentially misleading product claims, and consumer complaints involving brands associated with the same advertising operations.

The potential scale matters because advertising systems capable of reaching millions of people can also amplify deceptive representations when appropriate safeguards are absent.

The $4 billion figure is an attributed projection, not independently verified expenditure or proof of unlawful conduct.

The concern is not simply how much money these advertising operations could spend. It is whether consumers can trust the identities, medical endorsements, product claims, and purchasing experiences presented to them. At sufficient scale, misleading advertising practices can affect large numbers of consumers before individual complaints reveal a broader pattern.

Meta Ads Manager showing a campaign named W2S - John Top 3 - Audience Farm with ad sets targeting Real Housewives of Atlanta, Love & Hip Hop, Hennessy, Oprah Winfrey, Rick Ross and DJ Khaled
Supplemental exhibit · Audience farmsScreenshot I supplied from Meta Ads Manager showing a campaign named “W2S - John Top 3 - Audience Farm” with ad sets built around interests in Real Housewives of Atlanta, Love & Hip Hop, Hennessy (liquor), Oprah Winfrey, Rick Ross and DJ Khaled, alongside lookalike audiences of people who engaged with posts or pages over the prior 365 days. The left column, where each audience is named, is highlighted. The ad selected in the screenshot uses my own handle, @imjohnhunterjr, and points to an Evident Wellness product page. I believe Brandon and Jacob built these audience farms; the screenshot shows how they were named and organized and does not by itself establish who created them.
Messages attributed to Jacob Canfield discussing Black Girl Vitamins and targeting a proven product to a specific audience
Exhibit A · Audience and Product PositioningMessages from Jacob Canfield discussing Black Girl Vitamins, product positioning, and marketing toward a specific audience. They provide context for the advertising strategies discussed here but do not independently establish unlawful demographic targeting.
Messages attributed to Jacob Canfield discussing AI avatars, a claimed $500k monthly brand and doctors edited with AI B-roll
Exhibit B · AI Medical AdvertisingMessages from Jacob Canfield discussing AI avatars, “Old doctors edited with AI B roll,” and reported advertising revenue. They are relevant to concerns about synthetic medical endorsements; the revenue claims are not independently verified. The FTC requires that advertising endorsements be truthful and not misleading.

The Question of Company Involvement

Throughout my work, I personally observed Brandon Fink and Jacob Canfield's involvement in advertising strategy, landing-page development, funnels and website operations. I cannot establish whether the individual client companies knew about, approved or participated in potentially improper arrangements. That distinction matters, and I want it to stay clear: none of this claims that criminal misappropriation, intentional policy circumvention or company complicity has been proven. Those are the questions I believe investigators should examine, starting with the advertising expenditures, payment processors, revenue beneficiaries and relationships between the companies involved.

Documented History

Jacob Canfield's public history predates e-commerce. A doctor and Army veteran, Canfield became one of crypto's most recognizable analysts, reaching the #1 ranking on TradingView and appearing in outlets including Forbes.

Jacob Canfield's Signal Profits homepage with a photo of him
Jacob Canfield's “Signal Profits” homepage and a photo of him.

Then came 2020. Canfield faced public scrutiny over altered trading screenshots and controversy surrounding his crypto community. His once-prominent public presence faded. Years later, he resurfaced in a very different industry, this time as the operator of a rapidly growing performance marketing network producing advertising at massive scale.

Reddit post in r/Bitcoin by RulerZod
Exhibit 12Reddit post in r/Bitcoin by user RulerZod, posted approximately six years ago, asking for resources to pursue someone for Bitcoin theft.
Invezz headline: Crypto analyst under fire for allegedly faking trade screenshots
Exhibit 13Invezz headline: “Crypto analyst under fire for allegedly faking trade screenshots.”
Excerpt from published reporting on altered trade screenshots
Exhibit 14Excerpt from published reporting regarding altered trade screenshots.

These public posts from 2019 and 2020 show the scrutiny Jacob Canfield faced online that I believe parallels aspects of what I am alleging. They contain other people's allegations and opinions, not independently established findings.

Bitcoin Jack · March 13, 2020. Posts alleging deception and deleted tweets.
Bitcoin Jack · March 13, 2020. Posts alleging deception and deleted tweets.
Eli · August 24, 2019. Allegation concerning a TradingView chart.
Eli · August 24, 2019. Allegation concerning a TradingView chart.
Early Bird Special · August 24, 2019. Allegations concerning copied charts and content.
Early Bird Special · August 24, 2019. Allegations concerning copied charts and content.

WKND Digital and Prior Records

In 2021, SkyLab Ventures and Welling Media sued WKND Digital and Chandler Welling, alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, clients, employees and other business assets.

Brandon's business history also predates my involvement with him. WFMY News 2 previously reported on complaints from two elderly women concerning HVAC work associated with Fink, including allegations of defective installations and unlicensed contracting. One customer told the station that Fink acted as a "friend" but warned her about the risk of carbon monoxide poisoning while recommending additional work. Public records also document a permanent injunction arising from prior contracting conduct.


Section 04The Ecom List: Brands and Supporting Evidence

These are the brands, businesses and consumer complaints I documented inside and around the advertising accounts I examined. A business appearing here is not an accusation; it is a record of what I saw, and each relationship has to be evaluated on its own. Several brands connected to these operations have reached the country's biggest retailers or carry well-known faces:

To be clear: I am not suggesting that any retailer or celebrity participated in, or knew about, the wrongdoing I allege. I include them to show how far these brands reach into everyday American shopping.

Wired2Scale Ad Account, a.k.a. #TheEcomList

  1. I AM GIA
  2. Tiger Mist
  3. ARMRA (reported 7,600+ retail locations, incl. Walmart and Whole Foods Market)
  4. BRĒZ (sold at Target)
  5. The Calming Co.
  6. Insane Labz / Innovative Partners, LP
  7. Gains In Bulk
  8. Black Girl Vitamins / Maxwell Nutrition LLC / BG Health (listed on Walmart Marketplace)
  9. One-Sol
  10. Anson Belt & Buckle
  11. Auri / EJEC Ventures LLC
  12. Serene Herbs
  13. Deos / “Deos D.” (DEOSS)
  14. Podium 1 Racing
  15. Evident Wellness
  16. AKKA / TryAKKA
  17. Magna / People Brand Company LLC (sold at Target)
  18. Feel Goods
  19. The Canine Standard
  20. Ultra Pouches (promotional endorsements featuring Nate Diaz and Rampage Jackson)
  21. Blyss
  22. Enhanced Performance Products / Enhanced Telehealth / Enhanced Supplements
  23. Sisters Nutrition, “The #1 PCOS Supplement”
  24. Hyro / drinkhyro
  25. absorb.more
  26. Booty King en Español
  27. The Loaded Tea Shop
  28. Graymatter Labs
  29. Biologica
  30. Jupi Nutrition / Jupi
  31. Mutzel Nutrition LLC
  32. Groomie / ReVamp Electronics LLC
  33. Air Titans / Air Titans Pro LLC / Air Titans – Tampa / Air Titans – Indoor Air Experts
  34. Florida's Best Services
  35. DMV Home Services
  36. Orlando Christmas Lighting
  37. Jacksonville Christmas Lighting
  38. Xmas Lights
  39. Purple Nurse
  40. Purple 1
  41. Wired2Scale
  42. Marketing Titans
  43. Mafia Marketing

I have no reason to believe these brands represent the full extent of the businesses connected to, operated by, serviced by, or financially benefiting the individuals examined in this investigation.

To be explicitly clear: I am not alleging that every brand identified here knowingly participated in, supported, or was even aware of the broader deceptive practices examined in this investigation. Some of these businesses may themselves be customers, contractors, partners, or other parties that were unaware of the conduct occurring around them and may have been harmed or misled themselves. A company’s appearance in an advertising account, communication, platform, payment record, or other material I preserved does not, by itself, establish wrongdoing by that company, its owners, employees, or investors.

Potential Sources of Records for Investigators

I am formally and publicly identifying the following platforms and financial services as potential sources of records relevant to Brandon Fink, Jacob Canfield, Preston Cody Wood, and their associated businesses. Should law enforcement or a government agency open an investigation, I believe potentially relevant records may exist across the services listed below. Where legally appropriate, investigators may want to consider preservation requests, subpoenas, or other lawful measures to prevent relevant records from being altered or lost.

  1. Twilio
  2. Synctrack
  3. Lovable
  4. Wired2Scale Meta advertising accounts (plus his wife's and employees' Meta accounts)
  5. BNGR Meta advertising accounts (plus his wife's Meta accounts)
  6. Motion
  7. Repeat
  8. GoHighLevel, including agency and associated company accounts
  9. Arcads.ai
  10. Air.inc
  11. ElevenLabs
  12. OpenAI
  13. Anthropic / Claude
  14. Perspective
  15. Triple Whale
  16. Northbeam
  17. Discord
  18. Telegram
  19. WhatsApp
  20. PayPal
  21. Mercury, including the Marketing Titans account
  22. Bank of America, including two checking accounts and one lending account
  23. Google Workspace administrator accounts
  24. Cloudflare
  25. Stripe
  26. Gusto
  27. Notion
  28. BILL
  29. Possible private processing & cryptocurrency accounts
  30. Perplexity.ai

I am publishing this list as an investigative lead based on records and information I have preserved. The listed platforms are not being accused of or complicit in any unlawful activity deployed by Brandon, Jacob or people in their network.


Section 05What the Evidence Shows

Stepping back, the evidence in this report points to a small number of patterns. Consumer complaints cluster around unauthorized recurring billing, non-delivery, refund difficulties and adverse health reactions across multiple brands inside the same advertising account. The funnels I observed route consumers toward products or offers different from the ones advertised, using AI-generated medical professionals and synthetic testimonials to manufacture authority. Original creative is repeatedly reused as reference material for AI derivatives that then compete for the same advertising spend. And the same small group of operators, businesses and agencies recurs across brands, ad accounts and business relationships.

Some of this is established by my firsthand records and public documents: the ad-account exhibits, the funnel recordings, the consumer reviews, the WKND Digital lawsuit, the Black Girl Vitamins consent judgment, the public reporting on Fink's HVAC work, and Canfield's crypto history. Other parts remain open questions: whether any death was caused by a product, whether the ad-spend redirection was authorized or intentional, who controls the synthetic identities and fabricated companies, and how far the network extends. Those questions are why I am publishing this record, and why I believe regulators and investigators should look closer.

I believe what I uncovered is only the surface. Evidence points to dozens, potentially hundreds, of AI-generated shell companies using deepfake identities, synthetic businesses and deceptive marketing funnels to manufacture trust, conceal the real operators and facilitate fraudulent inducement and consumer deception while avoiding detection and accountability.

The complete list of my allegations

Jacob Canfield, Brandon Fink and Preston Cody Wood presented themselves to me as friends, mentors and business partners. Over roughly two years of working directly with people and businesses connected to them, I allege that they:

  1. Hid recurring subscriptions and rebills from consumers using alternative landing pages, deceptive checkout flows and other funnel structures that obscured material billing terms.
  2. Duplicated transactions, processed unauthorized recurring charges and used deceptive billing practices that caused consumers to be charged for purchases or subscriptions they did not knowingly authorize.
  3. Collected consumers’ credit-card and payment information through deceptive funnels, then used that information to process recurring, duplicate or otherwise unauthorized transactions.
  4. Built and scaled deceptive AI-generated advertising using fake doctors, fake nurses, synthetic customers, fabricated testimonials, manufactured social proof and AI-generated authority figures presented to consumers as real people or genuine experiences.
  5. Used AI to mass-produce advertisements, identities, testimonials, endorsements and marketing funnels, creating a deceptive marketing flywheel capable of reproducing the same tactics across brands, products and markets while concealing the identities and involvement of the people operating the system.
  6. Jacob used AI and deepfake technology to construct fabricated business ecosystems, including fake venture-capital companies, synthetic founders and employees, Slack workspaces, social-media accounts and LinkedIn profiles. These fabricated identities were reinforced through SEO and manufactured digital footprints designed to make the people and companies appear legitimate. I personally witnessed Jacob deploy this infrastructure inside an account.
  7. Used synthetic employees and AI-generated identities as supposed third parties and introduced them to brands while Jacob and his team remained behind the identities. This allowed them to conceal their involvement, operate on multiple sides of business relationships, gain deeper access to companies and their internal operations, and potentially obtain confidential information and trade secrets while avoiding detection and accountability.
  8. Used fabricated identities, companies and business relationships as instruments of fraudulent inducement and financial deception, allowing the real operators to solicit business, money, information, intellectual property and access while concealing who was actually controlling the entities involved.
  9. Duplicated products, offers, branding and marketing systems belonging to companies within their advertising network and scaled similar or derivative offers into additional markets, including Australia, Spain and the United Kingdom.
  10. Manipulated attribution, advertising data, performance reporting and funnel structures to obscure where transactions originated, which advertisements generated sales, who controlled the customer relationship and who benefited from the resulting revenue.
  11. Took more than $7,000 of my money, including funds transferred by wire.
  12. Induced me into contracts, partnerships and extensive labor through false representations about compensation, ownership, performance, business backing and future opportunities. At times, I worked 16+ hour days while substantially underpaid or unpaid.
  13. Hid and misrepresented my performance data, interfered with work tied directly to my compensation and prevented me from accessing valuable portfolio information while continuing to profit from my creative assets, strategy and know-how.
  14. Used AI, deepfakes, synthetic identities and fabricated social proof to gain my trust and induce my cooperation, including false or misleading representations involving founders, influencers, company representatives, employees, brands and business relationships.
  15. Obtained and exploited my intellectual property, raw footage, systems, training, strategy, ideas and personal experiences after I explicitly refused to sell or provide certain assets and capabilities to them.
  16. Used my original content and personal experiences as source material for synthetic AI advertising, including AI personas built around experiences taken from my real-life weight-loss story, without my authorization or compensation and after I explicitly rejected contracts governing that work.
  17. Used promises of substantial money, resources, equity, networks and future opportunities to keep me building and supporting their businesses while compensation, ownership commitments and other promises repeatedly went unfulfilled.
  18. Brandon Fink and Jacob Canfield eliminated a co-founder’s equity interest, consolidated their ownership stakes under their HVAC company, and then pressured me to surrender an additional 9% of my equity without compensation. I was excluded from the restructuring discussions and maintain that these actions breached our founding agreement.
  19. I explicitly told them I would NOT build these systems for them, help them build them, or help them find someone else to build them after becoming concerned about how they intended to use them. I also refused to provide intellectual property and capabilities that I believed could facilitate deceptive or unlawful activity.
  20. After those refusals, substantially similar ideas, systems, services and creative methods were replicated and scaled using AI without my participation or consent.
  21. When disputes arose, they repeatedly pushed conversations away from written communication and toward calls or video meetings, including requests to disable automated meeting transcription, followed later by confidentiality and NDA demands.
  22. Used bot farms (fake accounts) to sway public opinion in the comment sections when their products faced public scrutiny.

These are not allegations about AI advertising simply being new, aggressive or unconventional. I allege that AI became infrastructure for a broader system of deception: hiding billing practices, manufacturing identities and social proof, automating deceptive advertising, manipulating attribution, exploiting intellectual property and distancing the people operating the system from what consumers, creators and business partners were actually being shown.

Bring These Allegations to Federal Attention

If you believe you have experienced deceptive advertising, unauthorized charges, or other potentially fraudulent practices involving WIRED2SCALE or associated brands, you may file a report with the FTC. Provide truthful information based on your own experiences or available evidence. Filing a report does not guarantee an investigation.


Section 06Consumer Protection and Reporting

If you shop online, subscribe to supplements, or buy from advertisements on social platforms, a few habits will reduce your risk:

If you purchased from, invested in, contracted with, performed affiliate work for, or provided creative or performance marketing services to any of the agencies or brands discussed, and believe you experienced fraud, deception, unauthorized charges, withheld compensation, or other misconduct, I encourage you to preserve your records and report your experience to the appropriate regulator. If you have firsthand evidence - consumer complaints, advertisements, receipts, recordings - I want to hear from you. If these agencies introduced you to or referred you to a creative strategist or employee, I suggest you audit them.

File an Official FTC Fraud Report

If you believe you have experienced deceptive advertising, unauthorized charges, or other potentially fraudulent practices involving WIRED2SCALE or associated brands, you may file a report with the FTC. Provide truthful information based on your own experiences or available evidence. Filing a report does not guarantee an investigation.

My objective is accountability, not guilt by association. Consumers, creators, employees, investors and legitimate businesses all deserve to know when their trust may have been exploited. The complaints documented in this report, the advertising practices behind them, and the relationships among the businesses involved warrant independent examination by regulators, journalists and investigators.

I want the truth on the record.

Take Action: Report Suspected Consumer Fraud

Have you experienced misleading advertisements, unauthorized transactions, deceptive subscriptions, products that never arrived, or other potentially fraudulent practices involving businesses discussed in this investigation?

The Federal Trade Commission accepts consumer fraud reports. Your report may help authorities identify patterns of consumer harm.

Report Suspected Fraud to the FTC

Official U.S. Government Reporting Portal. Free to Submit.

If you believe you have experienced deceptive advertising, unauthorized charges, or other potentially fraudulent practices involving WIRED2SCALE or associated brands, you may file a report with the FTC. Provide truthful information based on your own experiences or available evidence. Filing a report does not guarantee an investigation.